For decades, the entire Catholic Church, instead of celebrating the Holy Mass of All Times - Mass of our time. Novus Ordo Missae was supposed to be the answer the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy of Vatican II - was supposed to be the culmination of the liturgical reform initiated back to the time of Pius X.
But is it really based on the daily (coniedzielnych) observation may be considered that this happened.
secular not quite deliver too many of wisdom - even a theologian, but not ask questions. A pressure of a whole bunch of them so - I'm just asking!
first Why does the Roman Catholic Church called. Latins do not recite any prayers in Latin? Since the
Sacrosanctum Concilium , we only allow the use vernacular in the liturgy. So why such a misunderstanding? Do not get too zreformowaliśmy? Does the language really does not prove the identity? And if the shows, whether it was allowed in the name of what was not to eliminate it from our churches? Does looking at the empty churches of Western Europe really to believe that there is greater understanding of the liturgy through the use of national languages? Why are we so removed from the secular right of contact with the language in which our ancestors prayed, which was the bond between Europe and the whole of Western civilization and also the Church throughout the world? Do in exchange for "understanding" did not receive a trivialization and vulgarization of the liturgy? Marne celebrants oratory performances in return for communion with the mystery? Should we not in accordance with a hermeneutic of continuity, which is said the present Pope to reform the reform? Go back to the sources of our identity - our tradition? Is not no priest dare to on a regular Sunday mass, although some parts speak Latin? Does the thought Summorum Pontificium laity have no right to although a Mass on Sunday was celebrated in the extraordinary rite, just after the Latin? Is the choir or the choir or organist can not learn a few solid Gregorian to cultivate our traditions?
I am just asking!
second Gregorian chant - by KL is singing his own Roman liturgy. I am Roman Catholic. Why is it so rarely hear in your church - Roman Catholic (though) Gregorian chant? Since it is the first place among all other types of songs, or learn more solids and one creed is beyond the reach of our organists, choir, priests, the faithful? Or instead of silica on the often inept singing songs reminiscent wielogłosie our Orthodox Church Music and choirs Schole should not start with the music, we któa clarifies? From the chant? Who will sing chant as our choirs will sing the Church Music? Certainly not orthodox choirs. How can we make contact with our tradition since the ousting of the church were her most defining thing?
I am just asking!
third Ad Orient - versus Dei. Have already forgotten that the Holy podczasMszy make an offering, and not each other but to God in the Holy Trinity. Why in our parishes with such resistance, we imitate the Holy Father Benedict XVI? Is there a setting crucifix on the altar of candles and traditional as it looks during the celebration in the Basilica of St. Peter is such a big problem? Is not it time for us signs that we should read and respond? Is the historic churches that are beautiful altars set up at the wall really should be celebrated in the choir at dostawionym second table? Had decided on this restorators not a requirement to remove these unwanted furniture the historic design? Do nothing if we pradziadom did not interfere in such a celebration that is to say that they were wrong? Are you really from them in something we differ from God? How to fulfill the ancient rule that the sacrifice heading for the East, the Orient Ad - toward the rising sun - the symbol of Christ, or in the direction of the Tabernacle or at least toward the crucifix? Many secular really would not mind, and it not koncetrowałoby us all the more on God than on the person of the celebrant? Do you really need to look like a theater actor, for which we all need to look at? Is it really this what the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council?
I am just asking!
4th Kanon
Are liturgy lectures in seminars, you can perform tests - to measure time in seconds reciting various prayers eucharystyczntch? Why do some jobs in the speed of reciting the canon? Is it really the most important reason for choosing the canon is the time of his recitation? Does saying the canon of the second mandatory? Did Conon, who was denied almost unchanged since the fourth century should not be the most solemn - Sunday? Do not build more of its identity by listening to the oldest prayers of the church? Is it really share the modernist view of modern man, which is particularly - and unlike in the course of history treated by God? What a pride? Is not waiting for us the same thing as them - death, the court, the sky (Purgatory) or Hell? Is not God worthy of your few minutes more? Does choosing a shorter prayer instead of the more solemn on Sunday is not a scandal? An offense against God? Is secularism has no right to hear the prayers which, on Sunday, being the most?
I am just asking!
5th Communion going. Does the adoption of the holiest sakrametu, Chrustusa must be so trivializing? Are not we commune with some unspeakable secret? Should not the respect and love of God? What do I want to serve and to whom such desecrated sacrament? Should not our human instinct to be seeing this descent of God to us even more unworthy of love, honor, respect and humility, fear of God? Why, then, it looks like mc drive? People grouped in the queue go - take - go further - sit down - chew? After all, supposed to be a feast of the Lord? Is Jesus at the Last Supper, also told the apostles to go? Or maybe "broke and gave it"? Does being an alter Christus - celebrant niepowinien klęczącemu give communion to the faithful, korzącemu themselves before God's majesty? God, who comes with love and healing of the soul to an unworthy man? Why are the churches threw the barrier of white tablecloths? These tables, from which a receiver which picks up can nourish? Is there really a symbol of the pilgrim people of God, which is implementation of a "queue" was worth it to destroy the traditions of tried and tested for centuries? Did not get the deposit of the gift that only we communicate flawlessly next? Is the Mass is our own? But we have been given? As said the Holy Father Benedict XVI, in the history of the liturgy has never been broken. And this is what survived to the Council functioned with minor changes from the first centuries of Christianity. So what do you zmianiać?
I am just asking!
0 comments:
Post a Comment